

Turn finishes into fair league points, weighted by field size. Free, no signup required.
Quick answer: a fair league points system scales points with field size, not just finish place - winning a 40-person field should score more than winning a 6-person one. Enter this week's entrant count and style below to see exactly what each place is worth.
Points generator
Set this week's field size and scoring style, then generate.
Points by place
20 entrants · 10 places earning points
| Place | Points |
|---|---|
| 🥇 1 | 445 |
| 🥈 2 | 265 |
| 🥉 3 | 195 |
| 4 | 160 |
| 5 | 135 |
| 6 | 115 |
| 7 | 105 |
| 8 | 94 |
| 9 | 86 |
| 10 | 80 |
A flat points table - 1st is always worth 10 points, no matter who showed up - is simple, but it quietly rewards consistency over difficulty. Winning a small week with 6 regulars becomes worth exactly as much as winning a big week with 40 entrants, even though the second result is a much harder achievement.
Scaling points by field size (entrants^fieldWeight) fixes that - a win in a bigger field is always worth more, while the decay exponent still controls how much finishing position itself matters within that week. The three built-in styles above are just different settings of the same two numbers, not fundamentally different formulas.
This tool generates the points table for one event at a time - accumulating those points across a season is up to you. A spreadsheet works fine for a small league: one row per player, one column per week. If you'd rather not maintain that by hand, BlindShark's league management tracks cumulative standings automatically, including each player's points, position, and movement from week to week.
Because field size changes week to week. If 1st place is always worth a flat 10 points regardless of turnout, winning a 6-person field scores identically to winning a 40-person field - even though the second is a much harder result. Scaling points with field size keeps the season standings fair across weeks with different attendance.
Standard balances rewarding field size against finish position. Winner Focused drops off more steeply after 1st, concentrating points on the top few places. Participation Friendly is flatter, so more of the paid places earn a meaningful share, encouraging consistent attendance over occasional big finishes.
Most leagues land somewhere around 40-60% of the field, similar to how a typical prize pool pays out - see the Payout Calculator for that comparison. Very small fields are floored to at least the top 1-3 finishers regardless of the percentage set.
You can, but it's worth being careful about. Points already awarded in earlier weeks were calculated under the old settings, so switching mid-season means different weeks were scored on different scales unless you go back and recalculate them. If you do change it, the cleanest approach is to announce it at a natural break - the start of a new season, ideally.
Not currently - this tool generates the points table for a single event, so you'd record each week's points yourself in a spreadsheet. BlindShark's league management does track cumulative standings automatically across a season, including per-player points, positions, and movement week to week.
No - the Payout Calculator splits real prize money by finish place for a single event. This tool converts finishes into league standings points instead, meant to be accumulated across many weeks into a season-long leaderboard rather than paid out once.
BlindShark is a full live poker tournament and league manager, a professional and customizable blind clock, table and player management, league standings, and results tracking, all in one platform.

Professional Live Poker Management
Join us at the Table
Have a question, feedback or just want to say hey? Contact us at info@blindshark.io